Deep Dive Learning

Master the core concepts of Executive Persuasion


The Four Persuasion Archetypes

Archetypes are determined by two dimensions: Goal Type (Tinkerer vs. Overhauler) and Execution Style (Planner vs. Improviser).

PlannerImproviser
TinkererTraditionalistAdjuster
OverhaulerDeveloperRevolutionary

Traditionalist (Tinkerer + Planner)

“Values order, stability, and clear-cut strategies”

Approach: Talk short-term, tactical benefits. Put everything on paper. Quantify when possible. Show detailed implementation plans.

They Fear: Untested ideas, vague plans, big sweeping changes.

Adjuster (Tinkerer + Improviser)

“Conservative but flexible. Knows change is needed but prefers small adjustments.”

Approach: Articulate the conservative nature of your ask. Present multiple paths. Ask for their opinions. Frame as “adjustment” not “overhaul.”

They Fear: Being locked into one path, big transformations, losing flexibility.

Developer (Overhauler + Planner)

“Grounded visionary who wants transformation with detailed planning.”

Approach: Show consequences were considered. Big plan broken into execution targets. GANTT charts. Vision + roadmap together.

They Fear: Unstructured change, ideas without implementation plans.

Revolutionary (Overhauler + Improviser)

“Wants big change now. Takes risks, agile and responsive.”

Approach: Talk game-changing potential. Stress urgency. Show flexibility to change course. Don’t bore them with excessive detail.

They Fear: Moving too slowly, bureaucracy, missing the window.

Key Insight from Class: Archetypes are context-dependent. You may be a Revolutionary for one initiative and a Traditionalist for another. The key is understanding where your stakeholders are for this specific initiative.